Theosophy - A few Truths About Theosophy - A lecture delivered by Bábu Bhagavan Das, M.A, F.T.S at a public meeting at Benares
A FEW TRUTHS ABOUT THEOSOPHY
by Bhagavan Das
Published in "The Theosophist" of September, 1889
and reprinted in "Theosophical Siftings" - Volume - 3 -
[A lecture delivered by Bábu Bhagavan Das, M.A,
F.T.S at a public meeting at Benares.]
[Page 28] THE difficulties in the way of a public advocate
for Theosophy are great. There is, first, the general prejudice
among the worldly-minded against Theosophists, who are commonly
regarded by that class as a set of sentimentalists who talk
much and do little. Secondly, there is the fact that the
majority of the Indian members of the Theosophical Society
are of the younger generation, and a youngster addressing
an audience of conservatives runs considerable risk of being
thought a violator of the proprieties.
But be this as it may — and ill or well as I may perform
this annual task of drawing your attention to matters theosophical — I
approach it in sincerity and earnestness. And sincerity and
earnestness have often been deemed excuse sufficient for
bad performances on subjects far less respectable than Theosophy.
Well, then, gentlemen, I shall lay before you a brief account
of the ordinary thinkings and doings of Theosophists, and
it will be for you to judge whether they deserve encouragement
or not.
They believe, in the first place, that there is much imperfection
in humanity still. I conceive no one will condemn this belief;
it is, at least, very wholesome for young people to entertain
it, for if they took it into their heads that they were perfect,
they would indeed not try to better themselves.
This imperfection they further believe to be inseparably
connected with the antagonism of man and man, a want of union
in humanity, a discordance of interests. Want of union they
ascribe to selfishness in its innumerable forms, and selfishness
they believe to be co-extensive with immorality. And want
of union naturally prevents progress in knowledge ; so much
of our time is spent in guarding against mischief from others,
so much more in doing mischief to these others, that we have
very little time left to devote to the pursuit of knowledge.
Observe a prominent fact — the daily growing mass of
papers wherever [Page 29] business men and money are concerned.
It is not difficult to realize and regret that so much time
and mental energy have to be wasted in merely counteracting
the equally growing evil subtlety of disingenuous persons.
Little hope can there be of progress in knowledge where
such waste of mind is rendered necessary by the conditions
of life, and, without knowledge, even less is the hope of
comfort in life, ignorance being the one sole cause of suffering.
To remedy this state of things the Theosophical Society
has proposed to itself, as its first object, Universal Brotherhood,
in order to counteract the selfishness whose results are
so mischievous. The natural result of this object — to
the extent to which it is achieved — is to be leisure
for the study of ancient books and sciences, for which the
Theosophical Society is forced to entertain a special affection
by the loose morals of modern products of human thought,
and the inability of these to promote the genuine interests
of humanity.
The third object is a development of psychic powers which
is expected to be, in turn, the result of a thorough comprehension
and practice of the principles set forth in ancient works.
In the degree in which these objects are realized our life
on earth would become more desirable. So think the Theosophists.
And here, gentlemen, at this stage of effort at self-improvement,
Theosophists have been suspected of political meddling! The
word "improvement" some of these sage critics
think can mean only political improvement. But the distinction
between external advancement and internal progress is patent.
The former may be the uncertain object of the science of
politics, the sole subject-matter of which is a fight between
the clever and selfish on the one hand, and the simple and
good on the other. The latter, i.e., internal progress, is
the sure aim of Theosophy.
Truly they have ill understood Theosophy who can confound
it with politics. Where the former exists the latter will
not; a community of Theosophists is expected to be free from
struggle, whereas the foundation of politics is strife. Theosophy
would develop the reason of all men, so that each may be
able to understand and rationally minister to his own as
well as other people's higher interests, which, when obtained,
may easily help to secure the latter also. Politics, on the
other hand, confines itself to these lower interests, the
outward concerns of human life, and, never going down to
the principles of human existence which regulate these outward
concerns, is more likely to fail of its ends than not.
To say that Theosophy is a mere Utopia at this rate, and
that the more practical interests of humanity are other than
those Theosophy deals with, would be very like watering the
leaves of a tree and neglecting its roots, simply because
they happen to be invisible. The minds that have left the
[Page 30] greatest impress on the world, the great religious
reformers, have, in their persons, practically proved that
the aim of Theosophy is not an unreliable or Utopian one.
Moreover, to fling the word Utopian in the face of any such
scheme would be especially out of place in India, where,
always, those have been actual realities which enter the
best minds of other countries but as dreams. Instance the
organization of a vast community into four classes or castes,
and a division of each life into four periods or Ashramas,
by which the same individual passed from sovereignty to hermitage
without the least hesitation. The consequence of this was
a finer morality than can be met with now, for the motives
to guilt were far weaker; what excites greed now was passed
by then in indifference. And it is the result of their Utopian
theory of life, so consistently worked out, that the Indians
out of all races can show the longest period of civilized
existence.
Observe, on the other hand, the ephemeral civilizations
of the Greeks and Romans; their duration can be counted by
poor centuries. The civilized life of the present so-called
great European nations dates within ten centuries back, and
it is very questionable whether it will count as many centuries
more. The Occidentals live fast, being eager to make as much
as they own out of this physical life, which is all in all
to them and can therefore show much material activity and
a glitter which is very likely to impose upon the unwary
beholder; but such fast and glittering life cannot last as
long as the steady and more genuinely comfortable one of
the staid Oriental.
The truth is that in these modern times the means always
takes the place of the end and thereby causes much mischief.
Are the Theosophists wrong, gentlemen, if they endeavour
to do away with this unhealthy condition of affairs, to give
a meaning to life, and to restore its proper importance to
the end ?
No one, indeed, can imagine that all men can be made to
think alike on all subjects, but this cannot be any reason
for not trying to make a few men think alike on a few subjects.
Whatever amount of unanimity can be established is so much
pure gain, and to abandon even an apparently Utopian scheme,
simply because it cannot be realized in its entirety, can
be but bad policy.
But, setting aside all other considerations, Theosophy could,
I think, be sufficiently defended on this one ground. That
is, that although the majority of the population of the world
are content enough to pass their lives in widespread poverty,
vulgarities, meanness, and wranglings, yet when a few unfortunates
happen to conceive a sudden dislike to this sort of life,
the only thing that can console them is Theosophy. With its
doctrines of Reincarnation and Karma, which most if not all
the Fellows [Page 31] of the Theosophical Society believe
in, Theosophy alone can restore the lost balance of mind — the
peace which is indispensable to the steady performance of
the duties of life. That its doctrines are false or true
will not matter so long as it is conceded that they are a
cure as real as the disease they remedy. For this reason,
gentlemen, if for no other, Theosophy merits the consideration
and encouragement of all. Everyone could thus at least recommend
to a faint-hearted friend the proper cure for his weakness,
even though he did not require any medicine himself.
|