Theosophy - The Lost Meaning of Death by Alvin Boyd Kuhn
THE
LOST MEANING OF
DEATH
by Alvin
Boyd Kuhn,
"For
I have heard from one of the wise that we are now
dead; and that the body is our sepulchre."--PLATO.
"The
command that meant life proved death to me."
--ST.
PAUL.
"You
have the name of being alive, but you are dead."
REVELATION
III, 1.
[1935]
In presenting
to the public the thesis of this particular address the speaker is overawed
by a twofold realization. He is aware, first, that the interpretation of all
ancient Holy Writ which he here offers will be disruptive of the established
creedal religions of the Western world. And, in the second place he knows that
the presentment will fall with such astonishing force upon Occidental religious
thought as to seem incredible in spite of an array of positive testimony certifying
its correctness. He may well be pardoned a feeling of hesitation and dubiety
in making the revelation, for it has involved him in a daring incursion into
interpretative terrain whither no scholar has penetrated before him. From the
penetralia of that little-trodden domain of ancient religion-mystery he brings
forth into modern light a discovery that will severely tax all the resources
of common acceptance. Traditional norms of thought do not readily relax their
grip on the general mind. It is scarcely to be hoped that an announcement so
subversive of accepted ideas in religion and theology will be received without
scepticism or resentment, since it invades a field in which conservatism is
most stolidly rooted. Traditions long institutionalized do not easily bend to
correction of principles basically vital to their very existence. Yet truth
demands insistently from her devotees her inexorable tribute of sincerity and
courage, and scholarship must flinch no duty in the line of truth-seeking.
It will
be impossible in a brief preview to do more than hint at the sweeping force
of the disclosure now to be made in the domain of religious interpretation.
It is permissible to assert that it will revolutionize the entire modus of such
interpretation in vogue since the third century of the Christian era. Not alone
one or two, but all of the doctrines of Christian theology will have to suffer
drastic revision and restatement in the light of the import of this announcement.
For in olden times the proper signification of the terms "death" and
"the dead" was the touchstone by which the meaning of all scriptural
writing could be gauged. The terms carried in their ancient usage a hidden or
esoteric connotation, which was at once a clue to the primary meaning of the
entire structure of theology and a key to the rational envisagement of our mortal
life. The sagacious ancients were content to let a secondary implication of
the terms, more readily apparent on the surface, prevail in the exoteric understanding,
while imparting to the Mystery Initiates an occult signification which bore
the real purport of Scripture, infinitely more informing and dynamic.
We are reliably
informed that the sages of old employed mythical and cabalistic devices at once
to reveal and conceal a profounder meaning in their sacred writings, using at
times "blinds" to suggest to the untutored a shallow rendering, while
conveying to those versed in symbolical methodology a far profounder message.
The most startling of these ruses was their use of "death". Teaching
for the living was put out under the guise of instruction for "the dead".
Great moral and spiritual systems were cloaked under the mask of "Books
of the Dead," as in Egypt and Tibet. This being so, the sequel will show
why a revision of our understanding of what was implied by the archaic use of
the terms will so radically transform the meaning of every single doctrine of
the Christian faith. For the key to the correct interpretation of all Scripture
is just this ancient theological connotation of the word "death".
What, we
may surmise, must have been the consequences to theology -- and to world history
-- of the loss of this arcane clue as far back as the third century! In imagination
we can roughly begin to depict the prodigious handicap under which the theologians
have labored for sixteen centuries. The depth of the darkness that has involved
the whole region of religious intellectualism can be sensed without difficulty.
It will hardly be a matter of surprise if we discover that every single dogma
of Christian systematism has been sadly distorted out of its original sense.
The discerning student is now able to trace the dire disfigurement of every
Christian doctrine. For as the liniaments of ancient beauty become outlined
again beneath the distortions of mediaeval and modern crudity, he is then for
the first time made aware of the unconscionable grossness of rendering to which
pure spiritual formulae of the arcane science have been subjected. He sees that
Christian doctrinal material was interpreted in blind ignorance of a former
recondite wisdom and that mass psychology has been made for ages the hapless
slave to the crudest of misconceptions. For, it seems, not a scholar, not a
theologian, mediaeval or modern, has been aware of the masked meaning of the
word "death", or suspected that it cloaked a cryptic signification,
the discernment of which would have necessitated a reconditioned statement of
every teaching or exegesis. Now, a clear inspection of Greek and Egyptian systems
brings the lost clue to light, with what consequences to modern thought as a
whole the mind is staggered to envision. In the flash of vivid light engendered
by the revelation one can again survey the beautiful field of ancient spiritual
truth, long buried under mists of ignorance. With one glance it can be seen
that the entire structure of theological science can have sane and pertinent
interpretation only by the application to it of the magical key that has been
so long lost. Equally clear comes the perception that is has been the want of
this key that has reduced religion to a meaningless babble of piety and sentimentalism,
degrading
the once kingly science of theology at the same time to the status of an outcast
from the seats of modern intelligence. With startling force, too, it can be
felt that the rediscovery may be timely enough to redeem the precarious fortunes
of religion and theology from the danger of total eradication in a world that
is fast growing less hospitable to them. Religion has been fighting a losing
battle in modern life, and one of the basic reasons now comes glaringly to light.
Indeed it becomes readily apparent that unless religion sets itself industriously
to repair the breach made in its structure by the loss of keystone elements,
it may not be able to withstand the assault of radical bitterness.
Christianity,
as a system of exclusive sacred truth or a unique revelation of divine wisdom,
is already reeling under the impact of one blow after another dealt it by the
study of Comparative Religion and Comparative Mythology. The "deadly parallels"
found to run so consistently and so strikingly between the life of the Gospel
Jesus and the legends of some twenty or more antecedent Christly figures
or Sun-gods, in the role of world-saviors, are rapidly piling up the evidence
that tends to jeopardize the validity of the entire body of Gospel narrative
as history. It is beginning to dawn on intelligent and informed students that
the New Testament Gospels are not the biography of any "person" or
living character at all, but are old dramatic books of the religious Brotherhoods,
portraying, not the "life" of any man, but only the spiritual history
of a typical figure. All previous Messianic characters, or Sun-gods,
were only such typal dramatizations of man’s inner life, under the form of a
representative "history". The Christs were simply ideal figures held
up before men to provide them with an inspiring picture of their own attainable
perfection. Unbelievable as it may appear, it is the fact of history that with
the lapse of time and the decay of philosophical culture, the more ignorant
came to take these dramatic heroes for actually living persons. And a designing
priestcraft, either itself now sunken in similar ignorance, or motivated by
piety or knavery, or both, found it advantageous to the interests of a worldly
ecclesiastical system to connive at the misunderstanding. At any rate, the Gospels,
which were only spiritual allegories (see the writings of Philo, Clement and
Origen, and note Paul’s statement that the story of Abraham, Sarah and Hagar
"is an allegory"), were about the third century converted into literal
history. And it was at this juncture that the ancient meaning of the term "death"
passed out of the ken of even the most learned of the leaders of Christianity,
and with it fled all possibility of retaining or regaining the deep inner sense
of the scheme of theology.
The appeal
of early Christianity to the ignorant masses, and the popularization of its
tenets, which were originally drawn from the esoteric schools and Mysteries
(see any good text on Christian origins), quickly
led to the obscuration of all but the most literal sense of scriptural material.
Christianity smothered out the ancient Wisdom-Religion or Gnosis, and by garbling
the interpretation of purely spiritual teachings, wrecked the machinery of the
arcane science. The main shift of the wrecked cabalistic mechanism was the cryptic
connotation of "death". Its restoration at this time will go far to
reconstruct the venerable enginery of spiritual wisdom. It may force Christianity
to admit its pagan sources, and thereby pave the way for a return to the primal
purity and sublimity it boasted when it first issued from lofty pagan springs.
It will tend to bring Christianity humbly knocking at the doors of the ancient
pagan temples, which misguided zeal closed in the fifth century. For the Ancient
or Ageless Wisdom, taught in the arcane schools of old, has had a modern rebirth,
and Christianity will find its salvation from almost universal distrust by recognizing
in the occult movement the spirit of its original motivation.
But certainly
many will have come here this evening challenging in their minds the legitimacy
of the wording of the title of the address. How, you are saying, can death ever
have had a meaning other than its common one, and how could that ever have been
"lost"? Before meeting your natural scepticism on this point with
its proper and adequate answer, perhaps the question may best be countered by
putting forth some other questions that may never have occurred to you. How
was it that the doctrine of the judgment lost its original meaning? How came
the doctrines of hell and purgatory likewise to lose their first connotations?
How did it occur, further, that the meaning of such events as the baptism, the
circumcision, the temptation, the transfiguration, the crucifixion, resurrection
and ascension has in the same way been lost or corrupted? How indeed did the
very birth of Jesus, his sudden burst of sage wisdom at the age of twelve, his
bloody sweat in the garden, his triumphant entry into Jerusalem, his trial and
mockery, all likewise drift far away from what they were taken to mean at the
start? How did all the miracles, all the parables, the whole outline, in fact,
of Biblical wisdom, suffer the loss of a primal interpretation and sink into
the veriest travesty or caricature of their true sense that humanity has ever
been asked to "believe"? For it can now be stated without fear of
contradiction that not an item of Gospel theology retains the most distant resemblance
to that grand meaning which it once held in the minds of the great sages and
illuminati. If you will answer these questions you will have a direct answer
to your challenge as to the legitimacy of our title.
All these
fundamental items of Christian theology have been perverted out of their correct
spiritual translation as the result of a momentous historical denouement about
which all too little is generally known. At the precise time at which Christianity
was being formulated, powerful currents
of economic, social and religious forces had come into play, the operation of
which precipitated a swift and drastic shifting of the center of gravity, so
to say, in religious values and motivations. From the days of Pythagoras and
Plato, when Greece was guided by the inner enlightenment of the great Orphic
Mystery teaching, the profound insight of Grecian philosophy had seen life on
earth as the critical sphere of destiny. Values were thought to be won and permanent
character established, by the deeds done in the body. Earth was the arena of
conquest in life’s struggle. The thing of chief importance was that which was
done here in this world. Our mundane acts, words and thoughts stamped the marks
of destiny on our souls. But with the loss of the spiritual Gnosis, human reason
became unable to cope with the apparent hollowness and futility of worldly experience,
and a sense of earthly defeatism and hopelessness seized the general mind. As
all hard-won earthly values were seen to slip away from their possessor at the
stealthy approach of age and decrepitude, to be finally snatched away by the
hand of death, and it was no longer known how the gains won by strenuous experience
were treasured up in man’s interior constitution, a despair of the good of mundane
life overwhelmed the consciousness of the age. Former hearty zest for living
gradually gave way to scepticism, cynicism and pessimism. Robust Greek philosophy
yielded in a century or two to badly understood forms of Oriental negativism
and resignation. Mortals turned their eyes from earth to the post mortem heaven
world as the locale of rewards and compensatory happiness. Gilbert Murray, the
Oxford scholar, has designated this transferal of values by his famous phrase,
"the loss of nerve" on the part of the Greek world. The substance,
as it were, had been extracted out of earth experience; a fatalistic resignation
set in and an earth-weary race fixed its eyes on heaven, the next world, as
the place where sublunary wrongs were to be righted and human ills and woes
blissfully compensated.
This revolutionary
alteration of viewpoint was the outer evidence of an inner loss. Humanity had
mislaid the chart of its spiritual destiny, and with it the location of its
pole-star of truth and wisdom. It had lost its light of guiding understanding.
And with it took flight also the last vestige of the true meaning of the religious
data. Sweeping clear out of the purview of this life altogether, and over into
another domain to which it was never intended to minister in the beginning,
fled the message of all the Scriptures. Religion had been instituted in the
first instance as instruction and guidance for man’s life on earth. But a false
indoctrination following the loss of arcane teaching caused the disastrous shift
in the focus of vision and the location of values. So that what had been intended
for our perpetual behoof in the life lived here, shot clear over the head of
this world and landed in another realm, the astral world of spirits. Religion
had become a cult of "otherworldliness," a looking to heaven
for fulfilments denied here. Hence arose the cultus of spiritualism, and indirectly
that of asceticism. Only in this light can we understand also the allocation
of the idea of "heaven" to a strategic or central place in nearly
all religions. For human yearnings demanded a region in which earthly failures
were crowned with poetic success.
A necessary
consequence of this change, this loss of knowledge, was the transposition also
of the continuity of progress for the soul from this life to the life in spirit.
If effort was to be held as absolutely fruitless here, then provision had to
be made for continued unfoldment in the life out of body. Not even the roseate
heaven could be made rationally satisfactory until this matter of perpetual
development was adjusted in line with specious reasoning. But here religion
ran into its most egregious error, and originated a chain of untold disaster
for human life and effort. It proved the ruin of all sound religious philosophy
and closed off the channel of all religious benefit. It defeated the prime purpose
of religion altogether, for it left man bereft of just those incentives which
would have inspired him to apply himself with courage, steadiness and fortitude
to the tasks for the accomplishment of which he came to live on earth. For it
postulated the thesis that souls, cut off untimely in their growth on earth,
would continue to evolve eternally to infinite glories of godhood, in the spiritual
spheres. Here was born a delusion that has stultified the spirit of mankind
ever since. For no more can a soul achieve any further cycle of growth out of
earthly body than can an acorn become another great oak without being buried
in the soil of earth. And this theory that has palsied an infinite amount of
human effort came by default of religious knowledge of the hidden sense of the
term "death".
Thrown under
a mental coma by the alluring force of the belief, short-sighted and blinded
faith has never seen that if continued spiritual progress were possible in a
discarnate existence after only one brief life on earth, there could be found
no warrant either in logic or in cosmic counsels for our projection into this
life in the body for the one fleeting career. The incarnation can never be justified
save by the postulation of reincarnation. One life here, thrown in with an eternity
of growth in a spirit realm, is an untenable thesis to explain a rational cosmic
procedure.
Speaking
advisedly, one may still freely assert that the obscuration of the inner meaning
of "death" has utterly wrecked the science of theology. It has been
the primary wellspring of that total illogicality and natural unseemliness in
the scheme of theology which has so widely deprived it of intellectual support
in the modern age. To a somewhat less extent, but still more considerably than
has been surmised, it has militated likewise to hold in confusion some elements
of the occult interpretation.
It seems indeed to have escaped discovery universally, and all spiritual teaching
everywhere has suffered in consequence.
The first
hints in the direction of the discovery were picked up when in the study of
the great system of Greek thought known as Neo-Platonism, with its interpretations
of Greek mythology and religion, one became aware of a peculiar handling of
the idea of death. To convey just what is meant by this statement it will be
necessary to quote a number of passages from the Greek writers themselves. They
are in themselves quite valuable and should be more widely known. The most lucid
renditions of Neo-Platonic ideas come to us though the translations of Thomas
Taylor. We begin with a comment of Taylor’s own on Greek ideas regarding human
life as a kind of death:
"They
believed that human souls were confined in the body as in a prison, a condition
which they denominated genesis or generation, from which Dionysus would liberate
them. This generation, which linked the soul to body, was supposed to be a kind
of death to the higher form of life. Evil is inherent to this condition, the
soul dwelling in the body as in a prison or a grave. . . . The earthly life
is a dream rather than a reality . . . the soul is purified and separated from
the evils of this condition by knowledge"--or what they called "philosophy".
The great
Plato is himself found saying that "men are placed in the body as in a
prison" and that he considered "the body as the sepulchre of the soul".
Taylor in discussing an opinion of Macrobius ascribed to him the conception
that "the soul in the present life may be said to die, as far as it is
possible for a soul to die; occultly intimating that the death of the soul was
nothing more than a profound union with the ruinous bonds of the body."
One noted
that the incarnation or entry of the soul into the body was often alluded to
as a burial! Then Pythagoras had written that "whatever we see when awake
is death". Likewise the great Plotinus had given hints such as the following:
"Death
to the soul is to descend into matter and be entirely subjected to it. This
is what is meant by falling asleep in Hades."
And the
renowned Virgil, the Roman poet, had shown that he was imbued with this same
Greek philosophy when he wrote:
"Souls
are deadened by earthly forms and members subject to death."
Plato had
compared our tenure of bodily forms to the situation of an oyster in its shell.
And Socrates had soliloquized in a long passage on the subject of death, asking
Cebes if it might not after all be true that we had come hither from a far more
radiant life elsewhere, and that we should properly regard the present life
as in reality a death. "May it not
be true that we are really dead?" he asks, intimating, like Wordsworth,
that we seem at times to have faint glimpses of a more vivid existence from
which we have fallen into this dullness of mortal life. It had been a matter
of some surprise, also, to note Milton’s expression of Adam’s astonishment in
the Paradise Lost, when on being driven from the garden under condemnation
of death, our first father found his sentence taking the form of a lingering
existence, not a destruction of his life, as he had expected. He discovered
that his "death" meant not his extinction, but a less vivid type of
life. He found himself condemned to a "living" death. He was made
to live and "suffer death", not to be annihilated.
We must
regard such expressions as this of Milton as being remnants of the ancient philosophical
tradition, which we find so tersely expressed again in the Gorgias of
Plato:
"But
indeed, as you say also, life is a grievous thing. For I should not wonder if
Euripides spoke the truth when he says: ‘Who knows whether to live is not to
die, and to die is not to live?’ And we perhaps are in reality dead. For I have
heard from one of the wise that we are now dead; and that the body is our sepulchre;
but that the part of the soul in which the desires are contained is of such
a nature that it can be persuaded and hurled upward and downwards."
Thomas Taylor
gives a portion of the comment of Olympiodorus on this passage, as follows:
"For
the soul, coming hither, as she imparts life to the body, so she partakes through
this of a certain privation of life; but this is an evil. When separated, therefore,
from the body, she lives in reality; for she dies here, through participating
of privation of life, because the body becomes the source of evils. And hence
it is necessary to subdue the body."
The idea
here hinted at is one of the basic theses of the Greek philosophy. For the Greek
mind, with conceptions derived from the Orphic wisdom, considered that all life
resulted from streams of vivific energy flowing forth from God, or the One,
the infinite fount of all things, sweeping on, as they express it in Thomas
Taylor’s quaint language, "from on high as far as to the last of things".
These streams of force sprang outward from the heights of spiritual energy and
suffered diminution of their power as they preceeded farther and farther from
the primal source, until at last they came to a pause in the inert arms of matter.
Their living quality was countered and finally stifled in the meshes of matter,
where motion came to a "dead" halt or suffered "death".
The "dying away" of a voice or other sound, or of the ripple made
by casting a stone in the pond, is allegorical of the type of "death"
here signified. Life comes out from its first Cause and meets its death in the
bosom of matter. But again we are required to distinguish between the "death"of
a power and its absolute annihilation or extinction. Life was merely held quiescent
in the grip of an element able to silence its activities. It had not ceased
to be. Its powers had only gone into latency. They would emerge again.
In this
connection it might be well for us to pause and face an obvious implication
of the data before us. For in the strict sense of the term, we must realize
that such a thing as death in the sense of total annihilation either of being
or matter is an unthinkable and impossible thing. That which IS can’t cease
to BE. That only which can happen to it is a change of state or transmutation
of form. It can only come into manifestation and go out again, yet never is
not. In the shadow of which considerations we must accustom our minds to contemplate
what is called death anywhere as the passing from a more to a less vivid and
active state of manifestation. "Death" is therefore accurately defined
as the less heightened, less vibrant, condition of any form of being or life.
And this gives solid philosophical base for the re-establishment of the ancient
meaning of "death".
But in spite
of scores of such texts and many similar hints before one’s eyes, the force
of fixed habitudes of thought proved as yet too strong for the full realization
of the meaning wrapped up in the term to come clear to consciousness. The mind
was still held fast by the delusion that the old philosophers were only speaking
fancifully, or in poetic figures, of the dreary character of moral life. As
life is often called a "hell on earth", one might easily extend the
metaphor and make of it a veritable "death". One thought the idea
was poetry, not conceiving that in a deeper sense it was also theology. Doubtless
many a scholar in the face of this material has formed the same opinion and
rested at that point. But the discovery had not yet been made. One was to go
farther.
The next
step was taken when in reading Lewis Spence’s Myths and Legends of Egypt,
the Egyptian form of the title of the so-called Book of the Dead was
for the first time encountered. It was given as Peri-em-heru, and was
translated as meaning "The Day of Manifestation," or, "The
Coming Forth by Day," or "Into the Daylight." It presumably
was in reference to the end of a long period of life in darkness. This translation
at once provoked the reflection that there was a mysterious incongruity between
the Egyptian title and the English one (given to it by the German scholar Lepsius.)
How could a book whose title read The Coming Forth By Day be fitly named
the Book of the Dead? Something was amiss here. Some one had blundered.
Yet the book dealt mainly with the great trial of the soul of the deceased in
the Hall of Judgment, the Hall of Osiris; and Osiris was the Lord of Amenta,
the realm of the dead,
the dark underworld. He was the king of "those in their graves". It
was apparently the book of the typical Christian judgment, enacted in the world
of souls following the demise of the body. Yet its original title was The
Day of Manifestation. Here was mystification and a thrilling enigma. One
knew that the Greeks had derived most of their profoundest conceptions from
the Egyptians. Was their figurative use of the word "death" based
on some hidden meaning in the Book of the Dead? Could it be possible,
one conjectured, that all mediaeval and modern scholarship had missed fundamental
meaning by failure to catch some legerdemain of ancient symbolism? Could it
be that some mighty truth lurked undiscovered under the metaphor? The mind caught
the flash of a possibility; it seemed too arrant a supposition for serious acceptance.
We had caught the truth by the tail, but the mind was not yet able to hold it
fast. It struggled loose.
Shortly
after this episode the study of the wondrous Egyptian mythical religion was
undertaken in full earnestness. The approach to this rich mine of truth was
fortunately by way of the books of Gerald Massey, the sole Egyptologist in the
ranks of scholars who measurably understood what the sages of Egypt were talking
about. It may be said in passing that the renowned Egyptologists have missed
the import of that body of sublime material utterly. Massey came nearer the
inner sanctuary of understanding than any other. The reading of his volumes,
Ancient Egypt, The Light of the World, had proceeded through some two
hundred pages when it became apparent that some statements relative to Plato’s
doctrine of Reminiscence brought Massey into direct conflict with certain of
the basic ideas of the Greek philosophy. Was Massey daring to say that the great
Plato was in error on this point? Sure enough; hardly had the page been turned
when the English scholar boldly challenged the Greek sage in a statement that
he (Plato) "had misapplied" the Egyptian doctrine of memory of our
past existences. But one knew without a moment’s doubt that not Plato, but Massey,
had misapplied the doctrine. Suddenly it was realized that Massey’s entire position
with regard to what he calls the "eschatology" in ancient religions
was wrongly conceived. And just as suddenly, out of the quandary of the thought
elements involved in Massey’s mistaken critique of Plato, flashed at last the
full truth as to what the ancients meant to be understood by "death".
The light of vision flashed, and the lost key to the ancient Scriptures was
once more in hand. As by the waving of a magic wand the whole meaning of religion,
in its large and basic features, was bodied forth in vivid light on the screen
of mind. At last one could see "what religion was all about". One
could now trace clearly the hitherto obscured outlines of the entire structural
system by which religion had been presented by
the sages of old to the early races. The whole body of ancient sacred writing
was at one stroke redeemed from dark meaninglessness to pertinent reference.
Light, understanding, lucid meaning darted with the speed of thought across
the whole field of religious interpretation. The ultimate principle of explanation
and synthesis had been found. The background and reference of all religious
myth and allegory and symbol had come to light.
The experience
of the moment was one never to be forgotten. The stupendous implications of
the new datum began to flood the mind until they threatened to overwhelm it
by their sheer magnitude. The first realization brought a sense of the incredible
magnificence of the structure of the ancient wisdom. As the revelation sent
the rays of a new discernment of meaning in every direction through the old
theological material, the mental sense reeled in presence of a veritable epiphany
of Cosmic Mind in sublime manifestation. The mind was thrilled and then awed
by gleam on gleam of new comprehension. But the very brilliance of the intellectual
light thus suddenly released induced a saddening reflection, for it revealed
by contrast the appalling darkness of the prevalent religious intelligence.
Side by side with the ancient flame of spiritual wisdom the murky feebleness
of present religious conceptions was disclosed for the first time in glaring
repulsiveness. How shameful had been the degradation of lofty spiritual ideology
was only now seen fully when the heights from which it had fallen were brought
into towering view. One saw the lamentable corruption, the incredible distortion,
which clear knowledge had undergone. It grew unmistakably evident that the main
purpose of religion in the world had been defeated; that its meaning had missed
fire; that mankind in the main had been cheated of the message put into its
hands by the demigods of bygone ages. History could be distressingly seen as
the misguided struggling of races deprived of the light they should have had.
If Christian nations were to possess the light again, it would become necessary
for dogmatic theology to confess its unconscionable crudity and accept thoroughgoing
correction, to be aligned once more with the nobility of its ancient ancestry.
And what
was the discovery that released all this vision and comprehension? What was
it that flashed in that moment of wrestling with Massey’s entanglement in Plato’s
doctrine of Reminiscence? It was the lost meaning of "death". With
overwhelming certitude had come the perception that when the ancient writers
of sacred books of religion spoke of "death" they referred to our
present life on earth in these bodies of flesh! And when they spoke of "the
dead", they again referred to us, here and now, alive as we seem to
be! And by the terms grave, tomb, coffin, sepulchre, mummy-case, out of
which we would be resurrected they meant these living bodies of ours!
In their theology, to die was
to incarnate in bodies on earth. It was found that the two words "womb"
and "tomb" are from the same stem and convey the same connotation.
He who enters life by way of the womb has entered the tomb of living death.
In their eyes, death was to live the kind of life we are living here. In reality,
as calm reflection then for the first time clearly indicated, for the soul there
is no such thing as death, in the sense of total destruction, for the soul is
indestructible. For it death could be at any time only a matter of relative
intensity or degree of life, and this would be dependent upon the character
and materiality of the embodiment in which it might find itself functioning
at different stages of its growth. And one saw then that our life here fitly
deserved the appellation of death because it was the most sluggish, inert and
restricted sphere of existence in which it was ever called upon to become embodied
and imprisoned. This type of life was the profoundest "death" it was
ever subjected to, as an individual entity! It could go no lower, be restricted
no more completely, than it was here. It came as an astonishing realization
in this connection, that we could never be any more "dead" than we
are now in our mortal habitat. We are truly in the very jaws of "death",
in the "valley of the shadow of death", and we are therefore the "dead"
of all the ancient philosophical books. Religion had been designed as instruction
and guidance for "those in their graves" of earth-life, and its sacred
books were meant to be a light for us, "the dead", in the dark underworld
of Hades, Sheol, Amenta! But long ago was lost the knowledge that such instruction
was for us, that we were "the dead" for whom all religious
systems were devised, and for whose resurrection out of the tomb of the physical
body the whole end and aim of religion was envisaged.
The first
corollary from this basic conception was the knowledge that the resurrection
could not connote the mere raising of decaying physical bodies from out a rocky
hillside tomb! It referred to the re-arising of the buried soul from out its
physical prison, its rending at last of the fleshly veil of the temple, its
bursting the bars of death in the body, which was the only grave, sepulchre,
tomb or sarcophagus that the wise ancients ever had in view in the promulgation
of their great Easter message! The whole framework, therefore, of the religious
temple was seen to be constructed of spiritual, not of historical elements.
The Gospel narrative was, then, a series of spiritual allegories, designed to
depict the nature of our own personal soul-life, the history of Everyman’s experience
in the world of flesh and matter, or in the "realm of the dead".
Further
research and constant checking of the "theory" against the possibility
of misconception or error finally placed the overwhelming weight of mountainous
scholarly data back of the interpretation and made possible the announcement
of the discovery as an assured fact. Not a single
item of ancient philosophy, not a statement anywhere in ancient texts, controverts
this conclusion in the least degree; whereas every new bit of testimony fortified
its tenure and increased its unassailability. Any theologian or scholar is challenged
to refute it.
Knowing
to what a degree the ignorant literalists of the third and fourth centuries
had despoiled the Christian Scriptures of their many vestiges of the arcane
spiritual Gnosis, one hardly expected to find any outright corroborations of
the thesis in the Bible itself. But the Bible is "The Book Nobody Knows",
and many and surprising are the texts one may find therein. Imagine, then, with
what astonishment one could greet the discovery of a remarkable passage in Revelation,
which abundantly confirmed the conclusion that the narrative of Jesus’s
life was the typical portrayal of the purely spiritual experience of
the soul, or "the god", in this realm of death. The verse refutes
the entire story of the physical crucifixion on Calvary, and therefore inferentially
of the physical resurrection of the Lord from a rock-grave outside the city
of Jerusalem. It is in Rev. XI, 8, and, speaking of the two witnesses
for Christ slain by the dragon, runs:
"And
their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually
is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified."
Here we
have Revelation declaring in words as clear as can be found, that our
Lord was crucified, not in historical Jerusalem, but in a spiritual city, a
city, furthermore, with two names, one of which is not even a city name, but
that of a country, Egypt.
Not only
does this verse negate the whole literal and historical interpretation of the
Gospel chronicle, but it adds its own corroboration to the new rendering of
the meaning of "death". For the place where the dead bodies of the
two witnesses, the two segments of our dual life as soul and body, shall lie,
as well as where the Christ in us is crucified, is thus marked as the place
of "death", which, as the new truth reveals, is this earth and our
life upon it. And it is further significant that Revelation gives as
one of its (many) names, Egypt. No one can long study Hebrew, Greek and Egyptian
religious literature without being assured that this term, Egypt, is used, never
in the sense of the geographical unit on the map, but as the chief designation
for the place, country or habitat of earthly incarnation. It is therefore a
figurative term for life on earth, or earth as the scene of incarnate life.
To "go down into Egypt" is a certain cryptogram for the "descent
into incarnation", or being born on earth. It is therefore equivalent to
life in the body. And indeed the name does often connote directly the body itself.
And here we have an interesting sidelight on the meaning of a term often used,
and of course used erroneously,--"the flesh-pots of Egypt". In our
ignorance of ancient
symbolism we have taken it to mean cooking pots full of edible flesh, on which
we feed more or less gluttonously. It was supposed to be a reference to our
addiction to the gastronomical pleasures of consuming a lot of beef, pork and
mutton. But in the light of the corrected view, it is at once seen to denote
nothing more than these physical bodies of ours. For they are indeed the vessels
(pots) of flesh in which our souls have taken lodgement for the period of their
life-cycles on earth. The "flesh-pots of Egypt" are only our bodies.
Egypt, then,
is the place where a bondage is suffered, where hard taskmasters drive one to
unceasing toil, where the members of the nation are scattered (the dispersion),
where there is famine and death, where there are plagues and pestilences, where
nature herself becomes verily full of scourgings. In the Old Testament the Eternal,
The Lord, frequently calls Egypt "that slave pen" (see Moffatt translation.)
And if Egypt is the type of our incarnational bondage, or our becoming subject
to "the law of the flesh", then the "Exodus" from it must
be in all respects equivalent to "the resurrection" of the New Testament.
With symbolism varied, it is indeed the same allegorism. For after a sojourn
in the land of "Egypt" we are released in the fulfilment of the cycle.
And always the "Exodus" from this "far country" (see the
Prodigal Son allegory) is made by crossing a water, the Reed Sea, Styx, Jordan,
Black Sea, Sea of Galilee (Galilee means "waterwheel"), "Dead
Sea", or other lake or stream. (For those who take their Bible literally
and geographically it will come as a hard blow to be told that their Red Sea
of the map and atlas is now gone out of the Bible altogether! It is no more,
and strictly, never was, in the Bible! It was there only by sufferance of a
mistake. A proper rendering is the "Reed Sea" and it is so given in
the Moffatt translation. It is one of the ancient designations for the realm
of incarnate life, equivalent to the "Papyrus Swamps of Egypt" or
the "Reedy Sea" (Ebers) of the life in the body--which is itself a
"swamp" or "mire" in the sense that it is a mixture of water
with earth elements.) To cross a sea or river was figurative language for crossing
the whole stretch of our incarnate earthly existence. To go through life in
the body was designated as a sailing over great waters. Likewise to undergo
the baptism by water was but another poetic mode of typifying our experience
in the waters of this bodily life. The Psalmist time and again writes of the
terrors of his soul at being flooded by great waters, billows, water-floods.
"Thy waves have gone over me, the water-floods have come in unto my soul.
Save me, O God, out of the great waters". Jonah, plunged in the watery
deeps, cried to God to save him "from the belly of death". Water and
death are here equated, and Paul has done the same thing when he speaks of "suffering
death with him (Jesus) in his baptism". Incarnation is a hundred times
portrayed under the figure of
a plunge into the water and coming up again. Baptism theologically never meant
anything other than to live the life in body, and at least one phase of the
aptness of the figure can be seen when it is realized that these bodies of ours
are about seven-eighths water by composition. The other fraction is of earthly
elements, giving us the basis of the ancient symbolism of incarnate life as
a swamp or mire.
Then came
the forceful recognition of a second corollary, equal in vital significance
to the first. If this earth was the grave or tomb of the soul, then, under the
ever-recurring title of the "dark underworld", this life was also
the literal Hades or "hell" of theology! Here on earth was the "dark
valley of Hinom" (Old Testament), the valley of dry bones (which were to
be reunited, reanimated and restored), the "valley of the shadow of death",
the Hebrew Sheol, the Greek Hades, the Egyptian Amenta, "the night’s Plutonian
shore" of Poe’s Raven, the realms of Avernus, Orcus and Tartarus,
the vale of Lethe, where the sluggish Phlegethon and the dark and murky Styx
flowed between the shores of life and death, the abysmal dungeon of Tophet,
and the dark and gloomy underworld of all religions, opposed to the radiant
and sunny "upper world" or heaven. Ever this was the "realm of
the dead", ruled over by Pluto, or Osiris, or Yama, or Seb or other infernal
deity. And we, says the Book of the Dead, are "the sleepers in their
coffins."
No phase
or development in connection with the discovery was more revealing and illuminating
than the perception of how the world’s most eminent scholars had wrestled with
the necessity of finding the proper location for this shadowy Tartaric abode
of the dead, driven on by their failure to identify it with the life here on
earth. Distinguishing it sharply from the life in body, and plagued constantly
by its name of "the dark underworld," they were almost forced to locate
it in some mythical region of gloom under the actual ground. This seemed the
more plausible because a "cave" or "grot" was another of
the symbols used to typify this life. Only the absurdity of so doing deterred
them from this asinine decision. Some were content to take it as referring to
the six-foot grave under the surface of the cemetery grass, the dark home of
the physical corpse. Most interesting of all was the mental squirming to which
even Massey was driven to find a tenable solution of the problem. He thought
he had his upon a plausible explanation when he divided human life into its
two phases of bodily incorporation on earth and its disembodied existence as
spirit following the death (of the body). To match the Egyptian mention of the
Two Lands, the Two Earths, or Heaven and Earth, he allocated the "dark
underworld" of Amenta to the second phase or the existence in spirit world,
and called it the Earth of Eternity, in contradistinction to the life here,
which he called the Earth of Time. Could he and the others have but known that
the earthly life was itself the "dark underworld",
i.e., under the heaven world, and not beneath the ground of earth,
they would have seen their analytical difficulties smoothed away in a moment.
They were like the man who goes around hunting for what he holds in his hands
all the while. They ranged about in every corner of heaven and earth to locate
the underworld of Amenta, not knowing they were in it all the time. Had Gerald
Massey been astute enough to grasp the correct status and location of the Egyptian
Amenta, and carry its implications through the body of theological dogmatism,
he would have done a work entitling him to be rated as one of the greatest benefactors
of mankind in its struggle against superstition. He missed the pinnacle by his
single failure to see through the trick of the ancient symbolizers of spiritual
truth, in calling this world the realm of "the dead in their graves."
Still counting
little on Biblical corroboration of the amended interpretation of "death",
we were quite startled again to come unexpectedly a little later upon a text
from the third chapter of Revelation (Moffatt Translation), which seemed
to give to the new thesis all the scriptural support that one could ask. Words
could hardly be plainer:
"I
know your doings, you have the name of being alive, but you are dead. Wake
up, rally what is still left to you, though it is on the very point of death;
for I find nothing you have done is complete in the eyes of my God. . . . If
you will not wake up, I shall come like a thief. . . . Still you have a few
souls that have not soiled their raiment."
It is expected
that exception will be taken to the application of this statement to humanity
in general, when it stands as part of the evangelist’s injunction to one of
the "seven churches" in Asia. Perhaps it is too much to hope that
naive literalism has yet passed beyond the stage at which these "churches"
of Revelation are taken for church congregations in the modern sense.
It is sufficient to reply that the reference of the passage is surely not locale,
but racial in a spiritual sense. And what words could better depict the very
situation in which the ancient Greek seers envisaged us? We have the name of
being alive, but we are dead! "Ye are dead in your trespasses and sins",
avers St. Paul. "The wages of sin is death", he repeats, adding, "To
be carnally minded is death". And under what other anthropological conditions
is man likely to become tempted to carnal mindedness than those which go with
his linkage to the body of flesh? And this incarnation came partly as the result
of "ancient wrongs" perpetrated by man in former cycles, so that his
"death" or incarnation is in one sense the "wages of sin".
"For ye are dead", Paul shouts once more, "and your life is hid
with Christ in God". To these assurances there was added a startlingly
direct passage from Isaiah: "We live in darkness like the dead".
There came to mind, too, Paul’s asseveration of a daily process of dying, as
we put off the old Adam, the carnal mortal
man, and put on Christ. And in II Corinthians he elaborated this statement
to give it fuller meaning: "Also bearing about in the body the dying of
the Lord Jesus. . . . For we which live are always delivering unto death for
Jesus’s sake. . . . So then death worketh in us. . . ." Passages such as
these could be multiplied. Jesus himself had said unto Martha: "I am the
resurrection and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet
shall he live." He was evidently telling us that although we are entombed
in the "miry clay" of the earthly body, our grasp on the reality of
the indwelling Christos will safely anchor us to the life of the higher spirit,
which is eternal.
The chief
point in the citation of these texts is to make evident beyond cavil that the
term "death" as used thus in the Bible can not possibly refer to the
act of physical demise, the common connotation of the word. How can one die
daily, if the word "die" has its common acceptation? To be born again,
to be quickened, as the Bible asserts so often, is to awake out of this lethargic
state of spirit subjected to the inhibitions and inertia of matter and body,
and to come into a new status where an access of spiritual energy revitalizes
every faculty of being into vibrant activity. "Awake, thou that sleepest",
shouts Paul again, "and arise from the dead, and Christ will shine
upon thee." Indeed, the miracle of raising Lazarus from "death"
is but a cryptic glyph for the process of reviving the deadened, sense-drugged,
anaesthetized faculties and powers of the soul from their benumbed condition
after long burial in "this muddy vesture of decay". No historical
Jesus ever raised to life a defunct and already corrupted cadaver. The episode
was written as an allegory depicting our spiritual awakening from lethal stupor
in the body. The whole story is found in the Egyptian Book of the Dead, complete
in every detail, written as early probably as 6000 years B.C. It was an allegory
then, and we may be sure it was an allegory still, when transcribed centuries
later into Hebrew literature. All the Old Testament, and much of the New, traces
to earlier Egyptian or Persian books.
In the seventh
chapter of Romans St. Paul speaks in such clear fashion of theological
sin and death as to leave no room for argument as to what he connotes by his
use of the terms thus so closely linked. By incarnation we came under the Law,
begins the Apostle. Under the Law we developed sin, which was our violation
of law while we were yet ignorant children (as expounded further in Galatians
iv.) Then by sin came death. The whole sequence is the "cycle of necessity",
as Greek philosophy called it, or the periodical descent of soul into the lower
worlds for its cycles of experience, which bring it "under the law",
give it the consciousness of good and evil, or the sense of "sin",
and subject it to a bondage to the flesh. As pre-human animals we lived without
Law, says Paul. Hear his words: "I lived at one time without Law myself,
but when the
command came home to me, sin sprang to life, and I died; the command that
meant life proved death to me. The command gave an impulse to sin, sin beguiled
me and used the command to kill me. . . . Sin resulted in death for me by making
use of this good thing. The interests of the flesh meant death. . . ."
Here are words of unmistakable meaning: the command that meant life
to us proved to be, theologically, our death. Had scholar’s known Paul’s background
of Greek philosophy, they would have known that he was discoursing on death
as the incarnation of the soul in mortal body. The Law (appropriately spelled
by Moffatt with a capital L) here spoken of, which is so large a feature in
Paul’s theology, and which has been so crassly misunderstood by interpreters
in Christendom, is that great ordinance of Nature which requires every form
of unfolding life to be buried periodically in the soil of the kingdom below
it, take root there, and out of a union with its elements, bring to birth the
new generation of its own life. It is the Great Breath of Brahm, ceaselessly
repeated. Cosmically it is the birth and death of universes; for man it is his
continuing rebirth in human form till perfection or godhead is attained. The
language of St. Paul in speaking of it, perhaps mutilated by hostile Christian
copyists, must ever remain mystifying until for "death" one reads
"incarnation". Under this touch a flood of sublime sense is at once
released upon the passages.
Then there
was the great Biblical allegory of the Prodigal Son. That the clear implications
of this central myth of the Christian religion have been so completely missed
by orthodox interpreters of Scripture is attestation enough of the blindness
of those who will not see. The myth is a cryptogram of our descent from a heaven
of spiritual consciousness into incarnation, or "death", as here expounded,
and our eventual return to the Father. The journey to "the far country"
is our coming out to this earth. Our eating the husks "that the swine did
eat" is our partaking of the very dregs of life in conjunction with an
animal body. Our revival of memory of our divine home is in line with Plato’s
doctrine of reminiscence. On earth we dimly remember the bliss and glory of
that life we shared in the celestial realms before we descended. And it is to
be emphasized in this lecture that when the Father, overjoyed at the wastrel’s
return, welcomes him home, he meets the sulky resentment of the obedient elder
brother with the happy exclamation: "Behold, this my son was dead and is
alive again." If this does not mean that our sojourn on earth is characterized
as a death, the allegory means nothing dependable at all.
Death and
sleep were often used interchangeably in reference to our life of burial in
the flesh. The characterization of life here as sleep can best be understood
by looking at some statements in the Tibetan Book of the Dead, where
it is said that at each descent of the soul from its celestial brightness down
the ladder of seven steps to the life in body, it suffers a
kind of "swoon". It swoons out of the consciousness of a more vivid
life on one plane, and awakens to a far dimmer type of awareness on the plane
below it. This is the true death or falling asleep of the soul in the vale of
Lethe. We are inducted from heaven to earth, then, by a series of swoons and
reawakenings, each time in a world of relatively deeper darkness and death.
Our entry into the sphere of material existence is in effect our burial. Says
Massey: "The buried Osiris represented the god in matter." This is
ourselves, if the meaning be localized on the human plane. Cosmically it means
the presence of life in matter, as the fire in the flint. Osiris is not any
"historical" personage. The Book of the Dead calls us the "mummies
in their graves", and again "the sleepers in their coffins",
as well as "the prisoners in their cells". Horus (Jesus) came to earth
to open our prison doors and release us. But our prison walls are the swathing
bands called our physical bodies. The three "days" are the three aeons
during which consciousness or soul was buried in the depths of the mineral,
vegetable and animal kingdoms before finding its possibility of release to self-conscious
liberty in the human kingdom, to which the Monad descended to "lift it
up". "As Jonas was three days in the belly of the whale, so must the
Son of Man be three days in the bowels of the earth", or the three kingdoms
below man. Jesus was given the keys to unbar the gates of death and hell, and
these keys were the spiritual laws and forces with which we can open the doors
of our dungeons in this world of Stygian darkness and Plutonic night. For this
life is the night of the soul, the twilight of the gods. Says Massey again:
"The
wilderness of the nether earth, being a land of graves, where the dead awaited
the coming of Horus . . . to wake them in their coffins and lead them from this
land of darkness to the land of day."
This is
the coming forth by day, of which the Egyptian title of the Book of the Dead
is a reminder. The "wilderness of the nether earth" is our own
good earth; the dead in their coffins are ourselves; our awakening to the high
consciousness of the realm from which we descended here is the purpose of all
earthly religion; and our being led out of this land of darkness to the land
of bright day is the end and victorious outcome of any practice of personal
religion. It is "the resurrection from the dead". Nothing other than
our own spiritual history is the subject of all these theological typograms.
Strangely
the Book of the Dead and other arcane Scriptures aver that there is a
"second death", more to be dreaded than "death" itself.
The Manes or souls flitting about in this dark underworld, veiled in flesh,dread
its incidence and rejoice at having escaped its clutches. "I have not died
the second death", exults the triumphant soul at the conclusion of its
earthly trials. In Revelation one of the rewards given to those who overcome
is to escape the second death. What is this second death? As the first death
is merely the advent of the soul on earth, its lodgement in body, the second
death is the falling so in love with body and its sensual life that instead
of lifting it up to union with its own higher capacities, the soul is itself
torn away from its upper connections and goes off a captive to the sin which
is in the members, as Paul describes it. The first death is merely the coming
to dwell in body; the second is to fail to effect an escape from it. Proclus
warns us that we may undertake the transformation of the lower nature on condition
that we do it "without merging ourselves in the darkness of body".
Plotinus enforces this with a statement that the soul need not regret her contact
with matter and body "if she flee promptly from here below". That
is to say -- and it is a matter of the most vital import for humanity -- that
it is in the order of nature for us to come to dwell in mortal bodies, but it
is in contravention of the normal flow of evolutionary currents for us to become
so involved in body as to go down to dissolution with it. By natural analogy
it is no ill hap for the seed to fall into the ground and even die there; but
nature is defeated if in dying the seed does not germinate again in a new generation
of life. If Christ be not risen from the dead, then is our faith vain, declares
St. Paul. If the soul goes down into death and the tomb, to be quickened into
a new birth of her latent faculties and capacities, and rises again bearing
with her the fruits of victory over the flesh and the grave, then may the arches
of heaven ring with jubilee at her return to the Father. For the powers of darkness
are no malignant devils, but the inertia of matter and the still unevolved capabilities
of the divine nature of all being. Darkness is just the absence of light, and
is itself potential light. When the Bible speaks of turning our darkness into
light, it is stating at once the physical and the spiritual processes which
primal life-force undergoes in its manvantaric period or cycle of manifestation.
Life immerses itself in matter, soul in body, for the purpose of transforming
latent capacity for endless perfection into conscious realization or actualization
of its self and its powers. The soul, says Plotinus, would never know her powers,
indeed she would never really exist, if she did not manifest her potentialities
and actualize her nature by progression into matter and form. But this requires
that she subject herself to the same inexorable necessity as that which confronts
the acorn if it is to engender the new oak. She must bury herself in the dark
soil of the kingdom just below her, and seize upon and transform by her fiery
energy the elements of that kingdom into the likeness of her own divine essence,
and so lift it up. This is the logic of the incarnation, this is the ground-fact
in all religion. And this was the deftly hidden meaning carried in the minds
of
the initiates in the Mysteries of old by the use of the term "death"
in all the grand schools of the arcane teaching.
A third
corollary of the truth released must not be passed over. It is of vast importance
and points to the necessity of quite drastic correction of current theological
conceptions. It affects the doctrines of Purgatory and the Judgment. Both those
episodes of spiritual history have been assigned to the wrong world. Deceived
by the figurative use of the word "death", the formulators of early
Christian doctrines shunted the main features of the spiritual drama from this
plane over to the spooky astral world. One is soiled and spotted by contact
with earth, said they; after death will come the purging and the reckoning.
But they did not see that "after death", in the abstruse theological
sense of old, meant just as well "after (the beginning of, i.e., during)
incarnation". If one’s birth is one’s burial or "death" in body,
then "after death" would fall in the life cycle, not following
it. Says an Egyptian text: "Lo, I come that I may purify this soul of mine
in the most high degree." It was a sad day for the world when Christian
intelligence lost the knowledge that the soul comes on earth to work out the
purgation of elements in its constitution that still require such a processing.
A doctrine of purely evolutionary significance was ignorantly misapprehended
and became transformed into a bogie to frighten the unlearned and credulous
populace. Likewise the Judgment. If the trial of the soul against the feather
of Maat, or Truth, took place in the Hall of Osiris, the Hall of the Two Truths,
(of life and death, or spirit and matter), the Hall (or Pool) of the Double
Fire, and finally in the great Hall of Seb (or Keb), there is an end to debate
as to its localization. For Osiris was Khent-Amenti, Lord of Amenta, King of
the Underworld, ruler of the "dead" on earth. The Hall of the Two
Truths again is our earth, because it is only on this plane of life that truth
becomes dual in sense and application. A thing is true here both physically
and spiritually, because man (on earth) is himself physical and spiritual, or
god-man, and every truth is discernible and applicable by him, alone of all
creatures, on two levels of cognition. For every spiritual truth has its material
counterpart or reflection. This explanation covers at the same time the other
name, Hall (or Pool) of the Double Fire. And if these items do not prove conclusively
that earth is the locality indicated by these titles, the last designation,
the great Hall of Seb (or Keb), settles the point beyond dispute. For Seb is
the "god of earth"! Another vital text from the Egyptian Ritual (Book
of the Dead) affirms that "through Seb thou dost become a spirit".
The meaning is unfolded and established forever. Earth, under the title of Tattu,
is called "the place of establishing forever". And all ancient wisdom
teaches just this fact. The pathway to heaven leads ever through the lanes of
earth.
The dynamic
power that religion was intended to exert on human life, but which fled from
it with the emasculation of its precepts in that fatal third century, will be
restored to it when the resurrection is again known to mean our final release,
in an ecstatic experience, from bodily incarnation, and the three doctrines
of Hell, Purgatory and the Judgment are brought back from an unreal spirit world
to our vivific life on earth. And the lost interpretation of "death"
is the datum that must enforce this revision. Religion will regain its vanished
influence when its tenets and creeds are once again seen to have direct pertinence
to our actual situation and its problems, here on earth.
We are indebted
to the renowned Egyptologist Budge, for a statement which reveals the dense
darkness of the modern academic world to this fundamental and pivotal point
in all religion. By its disclosure we are enabled to gauge the total incomprehension
which still enshrouds the field of theological exegesis, and we can see how
pitifully remote modern theory still falls from any true grasp of the allegorical
systems of old. The passage is the more noteworthy because the scholar certainly
did not dream he was writing anything of importance, anything that could possibly
draw the fire of a critic. Indeed it is a mere casual phrase introduced into
the midst of a sentence, but thus becomes all the more valuable in the present
discussion, because it embodies an admission of just the point at issue in our
exposition. He speaks at a certain place of "religious texts written for
the benefit of the dead in all religions". The author of that phrase
never for a moment suspected that any one would ever think of questioning so
commonplace a statement. He writes it as a matter universally known, agreed
upon and established in the world of scholarship. But let us ponder it. It contains
an assertion to the effect that Bibles and sacred books of religion were written
"for the benefit of the dead in all religions". Like the various Books
of the Dead, these ancient compilations were taken to be manuals for the guidance
of the soul in its pilgrimage through the several halls of judgment, testing
and purging after the corpse had been laid in the grave. It was alleged
that ancient peoples buried the scrolls and papyri with the dead body so that
the freed soul might have its legal brief at hand when it stood trial for its
record made while in the body. Apparently this thesis has never been subjected
to the most rudimentary type of speculative criticism. Else its glaring untenability
would have been revealed at once. For how can it be held logically supportable
that the wise framers of the great religions would have given to mankind an
elaborate code of moral and spiritual teaching which would not, however, be
operable or applicable in the life in which it was given, but would only become
so, or go into effect, so to say, in another life altogether? Are we to understand
that religious instruction was not given for us to profit by in this life, but
only to be put to
work when life was over, in some shadowy, dreamy world of spirit? We are asked
to believe that the sages ignored our moral needs in this life and gave us teaching
only to fortify us to pass the tests in the realm of wraiths! And this is still
the accepted belief in the highest academic circles, in our churches, seminaries
and universities! We are on earth only to think of the life in heaven! So far
has religion swung wide of its original spirit and intent.
And let
us revert for a moment to our Books of the Dead. Since they apply to us, the
living, their title at first glance seems to be a flat misnomer. But there is
no mistake after all! What seemed at first to be some one’s blunder in misnaming
such books is now clearly seen as our own former dulness and ignorance. They
are truly books of instruction for us, "the dead"! Here is found the
reconciliation between their name and their function. Given to the living, yet
called Books of the Dead; the living must then be those styled "the dead".
They were not written for the Manes floating free in the dream-consciousness
of the spirit plane, but for the behoof of us active, conscious souls gaining
our experience amid the scenes and labors of this mundane world.
It is written
that the last enemy to be overcome is death. Those faiths that struggle to solve
life’s enigmas without the concept of reincarnation, are forced to render this
text as meaning that man will eventually grow so "spiritual" (a grossly
abused and uncomprehended word in these days!) that he will linger on indefinitely
in his physical form without demise. How preposterous a supposition in a world
where life uses and then drops form after form in ever-recurring cycles! And
also how undesirable! If soul could not detach itself from aging bodies and
take up fresh new ones, each better adapted to its further expression, it would
be a sorry fate indeed for man. See, then, how the restoration of the primal
meaning of "death" brings elucidation of the text in accordance with
sane intelligence. Death is indeed the last enemy to be overthrown by the incarnating
Ego, but the "death" alluded to is just the necessary for continued
reincarnation. When life’s objects in this sphere have been attained, all lessons
learned, all powers unfolded, the twelve gates unlocked, then the cycle of "deaths"
or incarnations is ended. Then at last is "death" overcome, for life
on earth is ended. The soul is welcomed to its empyrean home, to occupy the
mansions of the Father and "go no more out". Then truly shall man
"die no more".
In the famous
53rd Chapter of Isaiah, where the graphic picture of the Christ as the
"suffering servant" is drawn, there is a verse the rendering of which
points rather strongly to an attempt on the part of Christian translators to
obliterate from the text an obvious reference to repeated incarnations as "deaths".
In the authorized version of the Bible
the verse reads: "And he made his grave with the wicked and with the rich
in his death". But the marginal note states that the final word in the
Hebrew manuscripts is not in the singular, but in the plural, and should read
"deaths". The soul, or the god in us, comes to be buried with every
kind of personality, the rich and the wicked alike, in his many incarnations
or "deaths". And with this interpretation another passage from sacred
lore is redeemed from inscrutable meaninglessness to living intelligibility.
We can no
more fittingly close than by presenting side by side two significant texts,
one from old Egypt’s Bible, the Book of the Dead, and the other from
the Christian Book, found in Revelation. I ask you to note a strange
succession, in both passages, of the idea of a first life, followed by death,
and that again by life restored. The Book of the Dead has this vivid
declaration from the lips of the Manes (the soul in the body): "He hath
given me the beautiful Amenta, through which the living pass from death
to life." Now let us place beside this the stirring verse from
the Apocalypse: "I am he that liveth and was dead, and
behold I am alive for evermore." Life, death, and life again. Here
are two ancient graphs, outlining our descent from a former place of life to
a "death" in order to win life still more abundant. And let us read
now with a new intelligence the ecstatic words of St. Paul as they ring out
to us from that climactic chapter of the Christian faith, 15 of I Corinthians:
"So
when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall
have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written:
Death is swallowed up in victory.
O death,
where is thy sting?
O
grave, where is thy victory?
As from
an oppressive dream we wake now to perceive that the light that should have
streamed from these tomes of truly sacred lore and irradiated every dark recess
of the human mind has been extinguished for over sixteen hundred years. By what
mishap and through what culpable agency this bewildering catastrophe was precipitated,
let research and inquiry determine. The staggering realization is that it did
occur, with consequences that no mind is able to measure. Seventeenth century
science did not dissipate the mists of the Dark Ages. This period of Western
benightedness will come to an end only when the arcane knowledge that was buried
in the books of wisdom is republished to a world now so habituated to darkness
that it will long blink the bright rays of the sun of intelligence
rising once again. For the basis of all wisdom in life is this ray of truth
that was darkened under a cloud of human ignorance in the direful third century,
and is only now discerned again in the full power of its shining. It is the
knowledge that man is a soul (Latin sol, the sun!) of ineffable and indestructible
light, a portion of the one glowing reality in the universe, but implanted as
a seed of divinity for a cycle of growth in the dark underworld of "death"
in the animal kingdom. No single sentence is more trenchant for human enlightenment
than the statement of Heraclitus: "Man is a portion of cosmic fire buried
in a body of water and earth." The soul in man has entered the kingdom
of mortality that it may live again and live forever.
|